Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Connections among companion personality feature similarity, matchmaking onset, dating top quality, and you can like. [ Website links ]
Baxter, L. A good., & Western, L. (2003). Few thinking of the parallels and you will differences: A beneficial dialectical position. Diary regarding Personal and you will Societal Relationship, 20, 491-514. [ Backlinks ]
Berscheid, Elizabeth. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and you can emotion. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you may incompatible relationship (pp. 143-161). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]
Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, Elizabeth., & Walster, Grams. W. (1971). Bodily appeal and you will relationship solutions: A test of your complimentary theory. Journal out-of Experimental Public Mindset, seven, 173-189. [ Backlinks ]
Diary off Public and private Relationship, 24, 479-496
Berscheid, E., & Regan, P. (2005). The new mindset from interpersonal relationship. Higher Saddle Lake, NJ: Pearson Training (Prentice Hallway). [ Backlinks ]
Berger, C. R. (1975). Task results and you will attributional correspondence given that determinants out of interpersonal destination. Message Monographs, forty, 280-286. [ Hyperlinks ]
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and you can personal relationships. In the D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & Grams. Lindzey (Eds.), The fresh new guide out of societal mindset (Vol. 2, fourth ed. Pp. 193-281). New york: McGraw-Mountain. [ Links ]
Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2004, May eleven). You.S. Patent 6,735,568. Washington, DC. [ Backlinks ]
Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. Roentgen., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2008, Nov. 18). U.S. Patent seven,454,357B2. Washington, DC. [ Links ]
Buss, D. Meters. (1984). Marital range to own personality dispositions: Comparison having about three various other research offer. Conclusion Genetics, 14, 111-123. [ Links ]
Byrne, D., & Rhamey, R. (1965). Magnitude away from positive and negative reinforcements as an excellent determinant regarding interest. Journal from Identification and Personal Mindset, dos, 884-889. [ Website links ]
Carter, S. R. (2005, Feb.), Having progressive-date Cupids, data changes matchmaking: Mental science are about the brand new successful fits generated at the eHarmony. Organization to own Emotional Technology Observer, 18. Downloaded out-of [ Backlinks ]
Carter, S. Roentgen., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2009). Improving spouse possibilities through the internet: An assessment out-of dating top quality between marriages due to an internet relationship system and you will marriage ceremonies as a result of unfettered options. Interpersona: A major international Diary into Individual Relationships, step three, 105-125. [ Hyperlinks ]
Carter, S., & Snowfall, C. (2004, May). Enabling men and women get into most readily useful marriage ceremonies playing with predictive types of relationship achievements. Report exhibited at 16th Annual Discussion of your own Western Psychological Neighborhood. [ Links ]
Method and you can system to own pinpointing people who find themselves planning enjoys a flourishing relationship
C). How does identity amount in the ination off trait stress, negativity, and you may relationship satisfaction. Journal of Identity and you may Personal Therapy, 78, 326-336. [ Links ]
Clark, Yards. S. (1985). Effects out of relationships type getting facts compatibility. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you may incompatible dating (pp. 119-140). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Coombs, Roentgen. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex differences in dating ambition and you may satisfaction that have computer system-put up couples. Log out-of ily, 28, 62-66. [ Backlinks ]
Cooper, An excellent. världens hetaste kvinnor 2022, & Sportolari, L. (1997). Love on the internet: Skills on line destination. Record of Sex Degree and you will Therapy, 22, 7-fourteen. [ Website links ]
Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Perform someone understand what needed: A similar otherwise subservient partner? Evolutionary Mindset, six, 595-602. [ Hyperlinks ]
Feingold, Good. (1988). Complimentary to possess attractiveness during the personal people and you can same-sex family unit members: A beneficial meta-research and you will theoretical complaints. Mental Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Links ]
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Away from popular with terrible: Disenchantment having an intimate spouse. Sociological Viewpoints, forty-two, 263-280. [ Backlinks ]
