Rosenfeld, M. J. (2010, April) worldbrides.org den webbplatsen. Appointment on the internet: The rise of the Internet while the a social mediator. Speech within Population Association out of The usa Group meetings, Dallas, Texas. [ Links ]
Shtatfeld, Roentgen., & Barak, A beneficial. (2009). Facts related to unveiling interpersonal connections towards Online dating sites: A viewpoint in the personal change idea. Interpersona: A worldwide Journal toward Individual Dating, step 3, 19-37. [ Website links ]
Skopek, J., Schulz, F., & Blossfeld, H-P. (2010). Exactly who contacts who? Instructional homophily in on the web partner alternatives. Eu Sociological Comment. [ Backlinks ]
Sprecher, S. (1998a). Insiders’ viewpoints toward reasons for having destination to help you an almost most other. Societal Mindset Quarterly, 61, 287-three hundred. [ Links ]
Sprecher, S. (1998b). Just what possess married people drawn to each other? Free Query in Innovative Sociology, 26, 193-two hundred. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S., & Duck, S. (1994). Sweet talk: The importance of understood communication getting romantic and you may friendship interest sense during the a rating-knowledgeable about go out. Identity and you can Personal Therapy Bulletin, 20, 391400. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). New dictate away from parents and you may relatives with the high quality and you may balance out-of close relationship: A about three-wave longitudinal study. Log from ily, 54, 888-900. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (2000). Romantic partners’ perceptions regarding social networking features towards the passing of some time and relationships transitions. [ Backlinks ]
Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Orbuch, T. L., & Willetts, Yards. C. (2002). Internet sites and change inside the individual matchmaking. In the A good. Vangelisti, H. Reis, & M. An excellent. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Stability and change when you look at the Relationships (pp. 257-284). Cambridge: Cambridge College or university Press. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Taste several things (in a number of anybody) more than other people: Partner choices inside intimate dating and you may friendships. Journal out-of Public and private Dating, 19, 463-481. [ Links ]
Personal Relationship, 7, 325-340
Sprecher, S., Schwartz, P., Harvey, J., & Hatfield, E. (2008). Inside S. Sprecher, Good. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook out of relationship initiation (pp. 249-265). Ny: Therapy Press/Taylor & Francis. [ Backlinks ]
Straaten, I., Engles, R. C. Yards. E., Finkenauer, C., & The netherlands, R. W. (2009). Conference your match: Exactly how attractiveness similarity influences method choices inside combined-sex dyads. Personality and you will Public Psychology Bulletin, 35, 685-697. [ Backlinks ]
Sunnafrank, Meters., & Miller, G. Roentgen. (1981). Brand new role out of very first talks during the determining appeal to help you equivalent and you can different strangers. People Correspondence Search, 8, 16-twenty-five. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sunnafrank, Meters., & Ramirez, A great. (2004). At first sight: Persistent relational effects of get-acquainted with talks. Log out of Public and private Relationships, 21, 361-379. [ Backlinks ]
Tenny, Age. Roentgen., Turkheimer, E., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2009). Being preferred is more than that have an effective identification: The fresh new part off matching. Record from Look into the Identity, 43, 479-585. [ Website links ]
Vangelisti, An excellent. L., & Perlman, D. (Eds.) (2006). The Cambridge manual out of individual matchmaking. Cambridge College or university Push. [ Links ]
Thebusinessoflove: Matchmaking initiation during the Internet matchmaking features
Walster, G.,W., Hatfield, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Dependence on actual appeal inside the relationship decisions. Log out-of Identity and you may Societal Mindset, 4, 508-516. [ Backlinks ]
Watson, D., Klohnen, E. C., Casillas, An excellent., Simms, Elizabeth Letter., Haig, J., & Berry, D. S. (2004). Match firms and you may price breakers: Analyses of assortative mating inside the newlywed partners. Diary out of Identity, 72, 1029-1068. [ Website links ]
Whisman, M. A beneficial., Seashore, S. Roentgen. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2008). Was relationship discord taxonic and will taxonic standing become analyzed reliably? Results from a national, user sample out-of married people. Log regarding Consulting and you will Medical Therapy, 76, 745-755. [ Hyperlinks ]
