Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s statement: “R. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”
Amoraim couldn’t dispute tannaitic rulings rather than tannaitic service even so they composed walls within Torah to quit inadvertent sins
This declaration by Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi generally removed all the menstruating people regarding the normal monthly period group and you can place them regarding the unpredictable position out-of zava since most regular episodes past about 3 days. Frequently their question try one to because of the complex clarifications needed seriously to choose when you’re niddah whenever one may getting an effective zava, that you’ll visited make a mistake having grievous consequences. Initial this new decree had restricted effect; it appears to be to own already been regional, and could was in fact restricted to times when doubt try with it as well as the local society was not well enough learned to decide inside the eg issues ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Indeed it wasn’t a broad decree for everybody from Israel, nevertheless is the initial step for the reason that guidelines. In the 1st several examples, Rabbi’s report deals with a female which can be a zava or may be a great niddah. She actually is handled in the first circumstances just like the a niddah, having a beneficial 7-go out age of impurity, in place of 1 day out-of impurity during the day regarding hemorrhaging, which is the code for a small zava. On 2nd example she’s managed just like the a good niddah and you may a small zava in case your first day is from inside the her ziva period (the fresh 11 months anywhere between menstrual symptoms). About third problem, she’s managed because the an entire zava. Most of the three rulings grab the a whole lot more strict updates.
Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi )
Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. We find a aic) «spokesman.» Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in http://www.datingmentor.org/tr/geek2geek-inceleme/ JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. Afterwards he stood to pray.” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.
